Stiles Wiki:Protection policy: Difference between revisions

From Stiles Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Short description|Policy on page protection}} {{pp-move-indef|small=yes}} {{pp-semi-indef}} {{See also||Wikipedia:Requests for page protection|Wikipedia:Lists of protected pages}} {{redirect2|WP:PP|WP:PROTECT|other uses|Wikipedia:Perennial proposals|and|Wikipedia:WikiProject Parliamentary Procedure|and|Wikipedia:Party and person|and|Wikipedia:Child protection|and|Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas}} {{policy|subcategory=enforcement|WP:PP|WP:PROTECT}} {{nutshell|Whil...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:
{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}}
{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}}
{{pp-semi-indef}}
{{pp-semi-indef}}
{{See also||Wikipedia:Requests for page protection|Wikipedia:Lists of protected pages}}
{{See also||Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for page protection|Stiles.casa Wiki:Lists of protected pages}}
{{redirect2|WP:PP|WP:PROTECT|other uses|Wikipedia:Perennial proposals|and|Wikipedia:WikiProject Parliamentary Procedure|and|Wikipedia:Party and person|and|Wikipedia:Child protection|and|Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas}}
{{redirect2|SW:PP|SW:PROTECT|other uses|Stiles.casa Wiki:Perennial proposals|and|Stiles.casa Wiki:WikiProject Parliamentary Procedure|and|Stiles.casa Wiki:Party and person|and|Stiles.casa Wiki:Child protection|and|Stiles.casa Wiki:WikiProject Protected areas}}
{{policy|subcategory=enforcement|WP:PP|WP:PROTECT}}
{{policy|subcategory=enforcement|SW:PP|SW:PROTECT}}
{{nutshell|While Wikipedia strives to be as open as possible, sometimes it is necessary to limit editing of certain pages in order to prevent [[WP:VD|vandalism]], [[WP:EW|edit warring]], or other [[WP:DE|disruptive edits]].}}
{{nutshell|While Stiles.casa Wiki strives to be as open as possible, sometimes it is necessary to limit editing of certain pages in order to prevent [[SW:VD|vandalism]], [[SW:EW|edit warring]], or other [[SW:DE|disruptive edits]].}}
{{User:Oshwah/Templates/PPRightPlace}}
{{User:Oshwah/Templates/PPRightPlace}}
{{Enforcement policy list}}
{{Enforcement policy list}}
{{Padlock list}}
{{Padlock list}}
In some circumstances, pages may need to be '''protected''' from modification by certain groups of editors. Pages are protected when a specific damaging event has been identified that can not be prevented through other means such as a [[WP:Blocking policy|block]]. Otherwise, Wikipedia is built on the principle that [[wiki|anyone can edit it]], and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors. This policy states in detail the protection types and procedures for page protection and unprotection and when each protection should and should not be applied.
In some circumstances, pages may need to be '''protected''' from modification by certain groups of editors. Pages are protected when a specific damaging event has been identified that can not be prevented through other means such as a [[SW:Blocking policy|block]]. Otherwise, Stiles.casa Wiki is built on the principle that [[wiki|anyone can edit it]], and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors. This policy states in detail the protection types and procedures for page protection and unprotection and when each protection should and should not be applied.


Protection is a technical restriction applied only by [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]], although any user may [[WP:Requests for page protection|request protection]]. Protection can be [[Wikipedia:List of indefinitely protected pages|indefinite]] or expire after a specified time. The various levels of protection are detailed below, and they can be applied to the page edit, page move, page create, and file upload actions. Even when a page is protected from editing, the [[source code]] ([[wikitext]]) of the page can still be viewed and copied by anyone.
Protection is a technical restriction applied only by [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Administrators|administrators]], although any user may [[SW:Requests for page protection|request protection]]. Protection can be [[Stiles.casa Wiki:List of indefinitely protected pages|indefinite]] or expire after a specified time. The various levels of protection are detailed below, and they can be applied to the page edit, page move, page create, and file upload actions. Even when a page is protected from editing, the [[source code]] ([[wikitext]]) of the page can still be viewed and copied by anyone.


A protected page is marked at its top right by a padlock icon, usually added by the {{tlx|pp-protected}} template.
A protected page is marked at its top right by a padlock icon, usually added by the {{tlx|pp-protected}} template.


== Pre-emptive protection ==
== Pre-emptive protection ==
{{Policy shortcut|WP:NO-PREEMPT|WP:PREEMPTIVE}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:NO-PREEMPT|SW:PREEMPTIVE}}


Applying page protection as a preemptive measure is contrary to the open nature of Wikipedia and is generally not allowed if applied solely for these reasons. However, brief periods of an appropriate and reasonable protection level are allowed in situations where blatant vandalism, disruption, or abuse is occurring by multiple users and at a level of frequency that requires its use in order to stop it. The duration of the protection should be set as short as possible, and the protection level should be set to the lowest restriction needed in order to stop the disruption while still allowing productive editors to make changes.
Applying page protection as a preemptive measure is contrary to the open nature of Stiles.casa Wiki and is generally not allowed if applied solely for these reasons. However, brief periods of an appropriate and reasonable protection level are allowed in situations where blatant vandalism, disruption, or abuse is occurring by multiple users and at a level of frequency that requires its use in order to stop it. The duration of the protection should be set as short as possible, and the protection level should be set to the lowest restriction needed in order to stop the disruption while still allowing productive editors to make changes.


== Types of protection ==
== Types of protection ==
{{Policy shortcut|WP:PPLIST}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:PPLIST}}


The following technical options are available to administrators for protecting different actions to pages:
The following technical options are available to administrators for protecting different actions to pages:
*'''Edit protection''' protects the page from being [[Help:Editing|edited]].
*'''Edit protection''' protects the page from being [[Help:Editing|edited]].
*'''Move protection''' protects the page from being [[Help:Moving a page|moved or renamed]].
*'''Move protection''' protects the page from being [[Help:Moving a page|moved or renamed]].
*'''Creation protection''' prevents a page (normally a previously [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]] one) from being created (also known as "[[#Creation protection (salting)|salting]]").
*'''Creation protection''' prevents a page (normally a previously [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Deletion policy|deleted]] one) from being created (also known as "[[#Creation protection (salting)|salting]]").
*'''Upload protection''' prevents new versions of a file from being [[Help:upload|uploaded]], but it does not prevent editing to the file's description page (unless edit protection is applied).
*'''Upload protection''' prevents new versions of a file from being [[Help:upload|uploaded]], but it does not prevent editing to the file's description page (unless edit protection is applied).


The following technical options are available to administrators for adding protection levels to the different actions to pages:
The following technical options are available to administrators for adding protection levels to the different actions to pages:
*'''Pending changes protection''' ''(only available for edit protection)'' requires any edits made to the page by unregistered users and accounts that are not [[Wikipedia:User access levels#Autoconfirmed users|confirmed]] to be approved by a [[Wikipedia:User access levels#Reviewer|pending changes reviewer]] or an administrator before the changes become visible to readers who are not logged in.
*'''Pending changes protection''' ''(only available for edit protection)'' requires any edits made to the page by unregistered users and accounts that are not [[Stiles.casa Wiki:User access levels#Autoconfirmed users|confirmed]] to be approved by a [[Stiles.casa Wiki:User access levels#Reviewer|pending changes reviewer]] or an administrator before the changes become visible to readers who are not logged in.
*'''Semi-protection''' prevents the action by unregistered users and users with accounts that are not confirmed.
*'''Semi-protection''' prevents the action by unregistered users and users with accounts that are not confirmed.
*'''Extended confirmed protection''', also known as '''30/500 protection''', prevents the action if the user's account has not yet reached at least 30 days of tenure, and has not made at least 500 edits on the English Wikipedia. In most cases, it should not be a protection level of first resort, and should be used where semi-protection has proven to be ineffective. Activation or application of this protection level is logged at the [[WP:AN|Administrators' noticeboard]].
*'''Extended confirmed protection''', also known as '''30/500 protection''', prevents the action if the user's account has not yet reached at least 30 days of tenure, and has not made at least 500 edits on the English Stiles.casa Wiki. In most cases, it should not be a protection level of first resort, and should be used where semi-protection has proven to be ineffective. Activation or application of this protection level is logged at the [[SW:AN|Administrators' noticeboard]].
*'''Template protection''' prevents the action by everyone except [[Wikipedia:Template editor|template editors]] and [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]] (who have this right as part of their toolset).
*'''Template protection''' prevents the action by everyone except [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Template editor|template editors]] and [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Administrators|administrators]] (who have this right as part of their toolset).
*'''Full protection''' prevents the action by everyone except [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]].
*'''Full protection''' prevents the action by everyone except [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Administrators|administrators]].


Any type of protection (with the exception of [[#Cascading protection|cascading protection]]) may be requested at [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection]]. Changes to a fully protected page should be proposed on the corresponding [[WP:Talk page|talk page]], then carried out by an administrator if they are uncontroversial or there is [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for them.
Any type of protection (with the exception of [[#Cascading protection|cascading protection]]) may be requested at [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for page protection]]. Changes to a fully protected page should be proposed on the corresponding [[SW:Talk page|talk page]], then carried out by an administrator if they are uncontroversial or there is [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Consensus|consensus]] for them.


{{anchor|RemovingProtection}}Except in the case of [[Wikipedia:Office actions|office actions]] (see [[#Office actions|below]]), [[Wikipedia:AC|Arbitration Committee]] remedies, or pages in the MediaWiki namespace (see [[#Permanent protection|below]]), administrators may unprotect a page if the reason for its protection no longer applies, a reasonable period has elapsed, and there is no consensus that continued protection is necessary. Editors desiring the unprotection of a page should, in the first instance, ask the administrator who applied the protection unless the administrator is inactive or no longer an administrator; thereafter, requests may be made at [[WP:RFUP|Requests for unprotection]]. Note that such requests will normally be declined if the protecting administrator is active and was not consulted first. A log of protections and unprotections is available at [[Special:Log/protect]].
{{anchor|RemovingProtection}}Except in the case of [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Office actions|office actions]] (see [[#Office actions|below]]), [[Stiles.casa Wiki:AC|Arbitration Committee]] remedies, or pages in the MediaWiki namespace (see [[#Permanent protection|below]]), administrators may unprotect a page if the reason for its protection no longer applies, a reasonable period has elapsed, and there is no consensus that continued protection is necessary. Editors desiring the unprotection of a page should, in the first instance, ask the administrator who applied the protection unless the administrator is inactive or no longer an administrator; thereafter, requests may be made at [[SW:RFUP|Requests for unprotection]]. Note that such requests will normally be declined if the protecting administrator is active and was not consulted first. A log of protections and unprotections is available at [[Special:Log/protect]].


{{anchor|Comparison table}}
{{anchor|Comparison table}}
Line 45: Line 45:
=== Full protection ===
=== Full protection ===
[[File:Full-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Gold padlock|link=]]
[[File:Full-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Gold padlock|link=]]
{{policy shortcut|WP:FULL|WP:GOLDLOCK}}
{{policy shortcut|SW:FULL|SW:GOLDLOCK}}
A fully protected page cannot be edited or moved by anyone except [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]]. The protection may be for a specified time or may be indefinite.
A fully protected page cannot be edited or moved by anyone except [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Administrators|administrators]]. The protection may be for a specified time or may be indefinite.


Modifications to a fully protected page can be proposed on its [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] (or at another appropriate forum) for discussion. Administrators can make changes to the protected article reflecting [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. Placing the {{tlx|Edit fully-protected}} template on the talk page will draw the attention of administrators for implementing uncontroversial changes.
Modifications to a fully protected page can be proposed on its [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] (or at another appropriate forum) for discussion. Administrators can make changes to the protected article reflecting [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Consensus|consensus]]. Placing the {{tlx|Edit fully-protected}} template on the talk page will draw the attention of administrators for implementing uncontroversial changes.


{{anchor|full-dispute}}<!--former tag allows section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
{{anchor|full-dispute}}<!--former tag allows section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
==== Content disputes ====
==== Content disputes ====
{{See also|Wikipedia:Stable version}}
{{See also|Stiles.casa Wiki:Stable version}}
{{redirect|WP:PREFER|what title name should be preferred|Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Primary topic}}
{{redirect|SW:PREFER|what title name should be preferred|Stiles.casa Wiki:Disambiguation#Primary topic}}
While content disputes and [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit warring]] may be addressed with user [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocks]] issued by [[WP:UNINVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators, allowing normal page editing by other editors at the same time, the protection policy provides an alternative approach as administrators have the discretion to temporarily fully protect an article to end an ongoing edit war. This approach may better suit multi-party disputes and contentious content, as it makes talk page [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] a requirement for implementation of [[Wikipedia:Edit requests|requested edits]].
While content disputes and [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Edit war|edit warring]] may be addressed with user [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Blocking policy|blocks]] issued by [[SW:UNINVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators, allowing normal page editing by other editors at the same time, the protection policy provides an alternative approach as administrators have the discretion to temporarily fully protect an article to end an ongoing edit war. This approach may better suit multi-party disputes and contentious content, as it makes talk page [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Consensus|consensus]] a requirement for implementation of [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Edit requests|requested edits]].


{{anchor|PREFER|prefer}}<!--former tags allow section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
{{anchor|PREFER|prefer}}<!--former tags allow section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
{{Policy shortcut|WP:PREFER}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:PREFER}}
When protecting a page because of a content dispute, administrators have a duty to avoid protecting a version that contains policy-violating content, such as [[WP:Vandalism|vandalism]], [[WP:COPYVIO|copyright violations]], [[WP:Libel|defamation]], or [[WP:BLP|poor-quality coverage of living people]]. Administrators are deemed to remain uninvolved when exercising discretion on whether to apply protection to the current version of an article, or to an older, [[WP:STABLE|stable]], or pre-edit-war version.
When protecting a page because of a content dispute, administrators have a duty to avoid protecting a version that contains policy-violating content, such as [[SW:Vandalism|vandalism]], [[SW:COPYVIO|copyright violations]], [[SW:Libel|defamation]], or [[SW:BLP|poor-quality coverage of living people]]. Administrators are deemed to remain uninvolved when exercising discretion on whether to apply protection to the current version of an article, or to an older, [[SW:STABLE|stable]], or pre-edit-war version.


Protected pages may not be edited except to make changes that are uncontroversial or for which there is clear consensus. Editors convinced that the protected version of an article contains policy-violating content, or that protection has rewarded edit warring or disruption by establishing a contentious revision, may identify a stable version ''prior to'' the edit war and [[Wikipedia:Edit requests|request]] reversion to that version. Before making such a request, editors should consider how independent editors might view the suggestion and recognize that continuing an edit war is grounds for being blocked.
Protected pages may not be edited except to make changes that are uncontroversial or for which there is clear consensus. Editors convinced that the protected version of an article contains policy-violating content, or that protection has rewarded edit warring or disruption by establishing a contentious revision, may identify a stable version ''prior to'' the edit war and [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Edit requests|request]] reversion to that version. Before making such a request, editors should consider how independent editors might view the suggestion and recognize that continuing an edit war is grounds for being blocked.


Administrators who have made substantive content changes to an article are considered [[WP:INVOLVED|involved]] and must not use their advanced permissions to further their own positions. When involved in a dispute, it is almost always wisest to respect the editing policies that bind all editors and call for input from an uninvolved administrator, rather than to invite controversy by acting unilaterally.
Administrators who have made substantive content changes to an article are considered [[SW:INVOLVED|involved]] and must not use their advanced permissions to further their own positions. When involved in a dispute, it is almost always wisest to respect the editing policies that bind all editors and call for input from an uninvolved administrator, rather than to invite controversy by acting unilaterally.


==== "History only" review ====
==== "History only" review ====
{{Policy shortcut|WP:PPDRV}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:PPDRV}}
If a deleted page is going through [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]], only administrators are normally capable of viewing the former content of the page. If they feel it would benefit the discussion to allow other users to view the page content, administrators may [[Wikipedia:Restore|restore]] the page, blank it or replace the contents with {{tlx|Temporarily undeleted}} template or a similar notice, and fully protect the page to prevent further editing. The previous contents of the page are then accessible to everyone via the [[Help:Page history|page history]].
If a deleted page is going through [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Deletion review|deletion review]], only administrators are normally capable of viewing the former content of the page. If they feel it would benefit the discussion to allow other users to view the page content, administrators may [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Restore|restore]] the page, blank it or replace the contents with {{tlx|Temporarily undeleted}} template or a similar notice, and fully protect the page to prevent further editing. The previous contents of the page are then accessible to everyone via the [[Help:Page history|page history]].


==== <span id="Protected generic image names"></span> Protected generic file names ====
==== <span id="Protected generic image names"></span> Protected generic file names ====
Line 76: Line 76:
{{anchor|Interface protection}}
{{anchor|Interface protection}}
[[File:Interface-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Brown padlock|link=|Icon for pages that can be edited only by interface administrators]]
[[File:Interface-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Brown padlock|link=|Icon for pages that can be edited only by interface administrators]]
{{Policy shortcut|WP:PPINDEF|WP:REDLOCK}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:PPINDEF|SW:REDLOCK}}


Administrators cannot change or remove the protection for some areas on Wikipedia, which are permanently protected by the [[MediaWiki]] software:
Administrators cannot change or remove the protection for some areas on Stiles.casa Wiki, which are permanently protected by the [[MediaWiki]] software:
*Edits to the [[Help:MediaWiki namespace|MediaWiki namespace]], which defines parts of the site interface, are restricted to administrators.
*Edits to the [[Help:MediaWiki namespace|MediaWiki namespace]], which defines parts of the site interface, are restricted to administrators.
**Edits to system-wide CSS and JavaScript pages such as [[MediaWiki:common.js]] are further restricted to [[WP:IADMIN|interface administrators]].
**Edits to system-wide CSS and JavaScript pages such as [[MediaWiki:common.js]] are further restricted to [[SW:IADMIN|interface administrators]].
*Edits to personal CSS and JavaScript pages such as [[User:Example/monobook.css]] and [[User:Example/cologneblue.js]] are restricted to the associated user and interface administrators. Interface administrators may edit these pages, for example, to remove a user script that has been used in an inappropriate way. Administrators may delete (but not edit or restore) these pages.
*Edits to personal CSS and JavaScript pages such as [[User:Example/monobook.css]] and [[User:Example/cologneblue.js]] are restricted to the associated user and interface administrators. Interface administrators may edit these pages, for example, to remove a user script that has been used in an inappropriate way. Administrators may delete (but not edit or restore) these pages.
*Edits to personal JSON pages such as [[User:Example/data.json]] are restricted to the associated user and administrators.
*Edits to personal JSON pages such as [[User:Example/data.json]] are restricted to the associated user and administrators.
Such protection is called Permanent, Interface, or Indefinite protection; and pages so protected can only be edited by those with [[WP:INTADMIN|Interface Administrator rights]].
Such protection is called Permanent, Interface, or Indefinite protection; and pages so protected can only be edited by those with [[SW:INTADMIN|Interface Administrator rights]].


In addition to hard-coded protection, the following are usually fully protected for an indefinite period of time (though not necessarily with Interface protection):
In addition to hard-coded protection, the following are usually fully protected for an indefinite period of time (though not necessarily with Interface protection):


* Pages that are very visible, such as the [[Main Page]].
* Pages that are very visible, such as the [[Main Page]].
* Pages that should not be modified for copyright or legal reasons, such as the [[Wikipedia:General disclaimer|general disclaimer]] or the [[Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License|local copy of the site copyright license]].
* Pages that should not be modified for copyright or legal reasons, such as the [[Stiles.casa Wiki:General disclaimer|general disclaimer]] or the [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License|local copy of the site copyright license]].
* Pages that are very frequently [[Wikipedia:Transclusion|transcluded]], such as {{tlx|tl}} or {{tlx|citation needed}}, to prevent [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] or [[Denial-of-service attack|denial of service]] attacks. This includes images or templates used in other highly visible or frequently transcluded pages. See [[Wikipedia:High-risk templates]] for more information.
* Pages that are very frequently [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Transclusion|transcluded]], such as {{tlx|tl}} or {{tlx|citation needed}}, to prevent [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Vandalism|vandalism]] or [[Denial-of-service attack|denial of service]] attacks. This includes images or templates used in other highly visible or frequently transcluded pages. See [[Stiles.casa Wiki:High-risk templates]] for more information.


{{anchor|template}}<!--former tags allow section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
{{anchor|template}}<!--former tags allow section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->


=== Template protection ===
=== Template protection ===
{{main|Wikipedia:Template editor}}
{{main|Stiles.casa Wiki:Template editor}}
[[File:Template-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Pink padlock|link=]]
[[File:Template-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Pink padlock|link=]]
{{Policy shortcut|WP:TPROT|WP:PINKLOCK}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:TPROT|SW:PINKLOCK}}
A template-protected page can be edited only by administrators or users in the {{int:group-templateeditor}} group. This protection level should be used almost exclusively on [[Wikipedia:High-risk templates|high-risk templates]] and [[WP:LUA|modules]]. In cases where pages in other namespaces become transcluded to a very high degree, this protection level is also valid.
A template-protected page can be edited only by administrators or users in the {{int:group-templateeditor}} group. This protection level should be used almost exclusively on [[Stiles.casa Wiki:High-risk templates|high-risk templates]] and [[SW:LUA|modules]]. In cases where pages in other namespaces become transcluded to a very high degree, this protection level is also valid.


This is a protection level<ref>Created October 2013 as a result of [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Template editor user right‎]]</ref> that replaces [[WP:FULL|full protection]] on pages that are merely protected due to high transclusion rates, rather than content disputes. It should be used on templates whose risk factor would have otherwise warranted full protection. It should not be used on less risky templates on the grounds that the [[WP:TPE|template editor]] user right exists—the existence of the right should not result in more templates becoming uneditable for the general editing community. In borderline cases, [[WP:ECP|extended confirmed protection]] or lower may be applied to high risk templates that the general editing community still needs to edit regularly.
This is a protection level<ref>Created October 2013 as a result of [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for comment/Template editor user right‎]]</ref> that replaces [[SW:FULL|full protection]] on pages that are merely protected due to high transclusion rates, rather than content disputes. It should be used on templates whose risk factor would have otherwise warranted full protection. It should not be used on less risky templates on the grounds that the [[SW:TPE|template editor]] user right exists—the existence of the right should not result in more templates becoming uneditable for the general editing community. In borderline cases, [[SW:ECP|extended confirmed protection]] or lower may be applied to high risk templates that the general editing community still needs to edit regularly.


Editors may request edits to a template-protected page by proposing them on its talk page, using the {{Tlx|Edit template-protected}} template if necessary to gain attention.
Editors may request edits to a template-protected page by proposing them on its talk page, using the {{Tlx|Edit template-protected}} template if necessary to gain attention.
Line 106: Line 106:


=== Semi-protection ===
=== Semi-protection ===
{{See also|Wikipedia:Rough guide to semi-protection}}
{{See also|Stiles.casa Wiki:Rough guide to semi-protection}}
[[File:Semi-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Silver padlock|link=]]
[[File:Semi-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Silver padlock|link=]]
{{Policy shortcut|WP:SEMI|WP:SILVERLOCK}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:SEMI|SW:SILVERLOCK}}


Semi-protected pages cannot be edited by [[Wikipedia:User access levels#Unregistered users|unregistered users]] ([[IP address]]es), as well as accounts that are not [[Wikipedia:User access levels#Confirmed users|confirmed]] or [[Wikipedia:User access levels#Autoconfirmed users|autoconfirmed]] (accounts that are at least four days old and have made at least ten edits to Wikipedia). Semi-protection is useful when there is a significant amount of disruption or [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] from new or unregistered users, or to prevent [[WP:SOCK|sockpuppets]] of blocked or banned users from editing, especially when it occurs on [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] who have had a recent high level of media interest. An alternative to semi-protection is [[Wikipedia:Pending changes|pending changes]], which is sometimes favored when an article is being vandalized regularly, but otherwise receives a low amount of editing.
Semi-protected pages cannot be edited by [[Stiles.casa Wiki:User access levels#Unregistered users|unregistered users]] ([[IP address]]es), as well as accounts that are not [[Stiles.casa Wiki:User access levels#Confirmed users|confirmed]] or [[Stiles.casa Wiki:User access levels#Autoconfirmed users|autoconfirmed]] (accounts that are at least four days old and have made at least ten edits to Stiles.casa Wiki). Semi-protection is useful when there is a significant amount of disruption or [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Vandalism|vandalism]] from new or unregistered users, or to prevent [[SW:SOCK|sockpuppets]] of blocked or banned users from editing, especially when it occurs on [[SW:BLP|biographies of living persons]] who have had a recent high level of media interest. An alternative to semi-protection is [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Pending changes|pending changes]], which is sometimes favored when an article is being vandalized regularly, but otherwise receives a low amount of editing.


Such users can request edits to a semi-protected page by proposing them on its talk page, using the {{Tl|Edit semi-protected}} template if necessary to gain attention. If the page in question and its talk page are ''both'' protected, please make your edit request at [[WP:RFED|Wikipedia:Requests for page protection]] instead. New users may also request the confirmed user right at [[Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Confirmed]].
Such users can request edits to a semi-protected page by proposing them on its talk page, using the {{Tl|Edit semi-protected}} template if necessary to gain attention. If the page in question and its talk page are ''both'' protected, please make your edit request at [[SW:RFED|Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for page protection]] instead. New users may also request the confirmed user right at [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for permissions/Confirmed]].


==== Guidance for administrators ====
==== Guidance for administrators ====
Administrators may apply {{em|indefinite}} semi-protection to pages that are subject to heavy and persistent [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] or violations of [[:Category:Wikipedia content policies|content policy]] (such as [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons]], [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]). Semi-protection should {{em|not}} be used as a preemptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred or to privilege registered users over unregistered users in (valid) content disputes.
Administrators may apply {{em|indefinite}} semi-protection to pages that are subject to heavy and persistent [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Vandalism|vandalism]] or violations of [[:Category:Stiles.casa Wiki content policies|content policy]] (such as [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons]], [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]). Semi-protection should {{em|not}} be used as a preemptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred or to privilege registered users over unregistered users in (valid) content disputes.


In addition, administrators may apply {{em|temporary}} semi-protection on pages that are:
In addition, administrators may apply {{em|temporary}} semi-protection on pages that are:
* Subject to significant but temporary vandalism or disruption (for example, due to [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia in the media|media attention]]) if [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocking]] individual users is not a feasible option.
* Subject to significant but temporary vandalism or disruption (for example, due to [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Stiles.casa Wiki in the media|media attention]]) if [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Blocking policy|blocking]] individual users is not a feasible option.
* Subject to [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] if {{em|all}} parties involved are unregistered or new editors (i.e. in cases in which full protection would otherwise be applied). This does {{em|not}} apply when autoconfirmed users are involved.
* Subject to [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Edit warring|edit warring]] if {{em|all}} parties involved are unregistered or new editors (i.e. in cases in which full protection would otherwise be applied). This does {{em|not}} apply when autoconfirmed users are involved.
* Subject to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] or [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] where unregistered editors are engaging in [[IP address#Dynamic IP|IP hopping]] by using different computers, obtaining new addresses by using [[dynamic IP]] allocation, or other address-changing schemes.
* Subject to [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Vandalism|vandalism]] or [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Edit warring|edit warring]] where unregistered editors are engaging in [[IP address#Dynamic IP|IP hopping]] by using different computers, obtaining new addresses by using [[dynamic IP]] allocation, or other address-changing schemes.
* Article discussion pages, if they have been subject to persistent disruption. Such protection should be used sparingly because it prevents unregistered and newly registered users from participating in discussions. A page and its talk page should not normally be protected at the same time. If a page and its talk page are both protected, the talk page should direct affected editors to [[WP:RFED|Wikipedia:Request for edit]] to ensure that no editor is entirely prevented from contributing.
* Article discussion pages, if they have been subject to persistent disruption. Such protection should be used sparingly because it prevents unregistered and newly registered users from participating in discussions. A page and its talk page should not normally be protected at the same time. If a page and its talk page are both protected, the talk page should direct affected editors to [[SW:RFED|Stiles.casa Wiki:Request for edit]] to ensure that no editor is entirely prevented from contributing.
* Protection should be used sparingly on the talk pages of blocked users, including IP addresses. Instead the user should be re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. When required, or when re-blocking without talk page editing allowed is unsuccessful, protection should be implemented for only a brief period not exceeding the duration of the block.
* Protection should be used sparingly on the talk pages of blocked users, including IP addresses. Instead the user should be re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. When required, or when re-blocking without talk page editing allowed is unsuccessful, protection should be implemented for only a brief period not exceeding the duration of the block.


[[Wikipedia:Today's featured article|Today's featured article]] may be semi-protected just like any other article. However since the article is subject to sudden spurts of vandalism during certain times of day, administrators should semi-protect it for brief periods of time in most instances. For the former guideline, see [[Wikipedia:Main Page featured article protection]].
[[Stiles.casa Wiki:Today's featured article|Today's featured article]] may be semi-protected just like any other article. However since the article is subject to sudden spurts of vandalism during certain times of day, administrators should semi-protect it for brief periods of time in most instances. For the former guideline, see [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Main Page featured article protection]].
{{Clear}}{{anchor|create}}{{anchor|Creation protection}}<!-- Anchors to former names of the section allows linking to the section while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT. -->
{{Clear}}{{anchor|create}}{{anchor|Creation protection}}<!-- Anchors to former names of the section allows linking to the section while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT. -->


=== Creation protection (salting) ===
=== Creation protection (salting) ===
[[File:Create-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Blue padlock|link=]]
[[File:Create-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Blue padlock|link=]]
{{policy shortcut|WP:SALT|WP:SKYBLUELOCK}}
{{policy shortcut|SW:SALT|SW:SKYBLUELOCK}}


Administrators can prevent the creation of pages. This level of protection is useful for pages that have been [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]] but repeatedly recreated. Such protection is case-sensitive. There are several levels of creation protection that can be applied to pages, identical to the levels for edit protection. A list of protected titles may be found at [[Special:ProtectedTitles]] (see also [[WP:Protected titles/Historical|historical lists]]).
Administrators can prevent the creation of pages. This level of protection is useful for pages that have been [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Deletion policy|deleted]] but repeatedly recreated. Such protection is case-sensitive. There are several levels of creation protection that can be applied to pages, identical to the levels for edit protection. A list of protected titles may be found at [[Special:ProtectedTitles]] (see also [[SW:Protected titles/Historical|historical lists]]).


Pre-emptive restrictions on new article titles are instituted through the [[MediaWiki:Titleblacklist|title blacklist]] system, which allows for more flexible protection with support for [[substring]]s and [[regular expression]]s.
Pre-emptive restrictions on new article titles are instituted through the [[MediaWiki:Titleblacklist|title blacklist]] system, which allows for more flexible protection with support for [[substring]]s and [[regular expression]]s.


{{Anchor| Salted}}Pages that have been creation-protected are sometimes referred to as "[[salting the earth |salted]]". Editors wishing to re-create a salted title with appropriate content should either contact an [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrator]] (preferably the protecting administrator), file a request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for reduction in protection level]], or use the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] process. To make a convincing case for re-creation, it is helpful to show a [[WP:Drafts|draft version]] of the intended article when filing a request.
{{Anchor| Salted}}Pages that have been creation-protected are sometimes referred to as "[[salting the earth |salted]]". Editors wishing to re-create a salted title with appropriate content should either contact an [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Administrators|administrator]] (preferably the protecting administrator), file a request at [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for page protection#Current requests for reduction in protection level]], or use the [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Deletion review|deletion review]] process. To make a convincing case for re-creation, it is helpful to show a [[SW:Drafts|draft version]] of the intended article when filing a request.


Administrators should choose the appropriate level of create protection—autoconfirmed, extended-confirmed,<ref name="ECPRFC2"/> or full. Due to the implementation of [[WP:ACPERM|ACPERM]], non-confirmed editors cannot create pages in [[WP:MAINSPACE|mainspace]]; thus, semi-creation protection should be rare, used only for protection of pages outside of mainspace.
Administrators should choose the appropriate level of create protection—autoconfirmed, extended-confirmed,<ref name="ECPRFC2"/> or full. Due to the implementation of [[SW:ACPERM|ACPERM]], non-confirmed editors cannot create pages in [[SW:MAINSPACE|mainspace]]; thus, semi-creation protection should be rare, used only for protection of pages outside of mainspace.


While creation-protection is usually permanent, temporary creation protection may be applied if a page is repeatedly recreated by a single user (or [[WP:SOCK|sockpuppets]] of that user, if applicable).
While creation-protection is usually permanent, temporary creation protection may be applied if a page is repeatedly recreated by a single user (or [[SW:SOCK|sockpuppets]] of that user, if applicable).


{{Clear}}{{anchor|move}}<!--former tag allows section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
{{Clear}}{{anchor|move}}<!--former tag allows section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
Line 145: Line 145:
=== Move protection ===
=== Move protection ===
[[File:Move-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Green padlock|link=]]
[[File:Move-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Green padlock|link=]]
{{Policy shortcut|WP:MOVP|WP:GREENLOCK}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:MOVP|SW:GREENLOCK}}


Move-protected pages, or more technically, fully move-protected pages, cannot be moved to a new title except by an administrator. Move protection is commonly applied to:
Move-protected pages, or more technically, fully move-protected pages, cannot be moved to a new title except by an administrator. Move protection is commonly applied to:


* Pages subject to persistent page-move [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]].
* Pages subject to persistent page-move [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Vandalism|vandalism]].
* Pages subject to a page-name dispute.
* Pages subject to a page-name dispute.
* Highly visible pages that have no reason to be moved, such as the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard|administrators' noticeboard]] and articles selected as "[[Wikipedia:Today's featured article|Today's featured article]]" on the main page.
* Highly visible pages that have no reason to be moved, such as the [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard|administrators' noticeboard]] and articles selected as "[[Stiles.casa Wiki:Today's featured article|Today's featured article]]" on the main page.


Fully edit-protected pages are also implicitly move-protected.
Fully edit-protected pages are also implicitly move-protected.
Line 157: Line 157:
As with full edit protection, protection because of edit warring [[:meta:The Wrong Version|should not be considered an endorsement of the current name]]. When move protection is applied during a requested move discussion, the page should be protected at the location it was at when the move request was started.
As with full edit protection, protection because of edit warring [[:meta:The Wrong Version|should not be considered an endorsement of the current name]]. When move protection is applied during a requested move discussion, the page should be protected at the location it was at when the move request was started.


All [[WP:FILE|files]] are implicitly move-protected; only [[WP:File mover|file movers]] and administrators can rename files.
All [[SW:FILE|files]] are implicitly move-protected; only [[SW:File mover|file movers]] and administrators can rename files.


{{Clear}}{{anchor|upload}}<!--former tag allows section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
{{Clear}}{{anchor|upload}}<!--former tag allows section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
Line 163: Line 163:
=== Upload protection ===
=== Upload protection ===
[[File:Upload-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Purple padlock|link=]]
[[File:Upload-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Purple padlock|link=]]
{{Policy shortcut|WP:UPLOAD-P|WP:PURPLELOCK}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:UPLOAD-P|SW:PURPLELOCK}}
Upload-protected files, or more technically, fully upload-protected files, cannot be replaced with new versions except by an administrator. Upload protection does not protect file pages from editing. It may be applied by an administrator to:
Upload-protected files, or more technically, fully upload-protected files, cannot be replaced with new versions except by an administrator. Upload protection does not protect file pages from editing. It may be applied by an administrator to:
* Files subject to persistent upload [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]].
* Files subject to persistent upload [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Vandalism|vandalism]].
* Files subject to a dispute between editors.
* Files subject to a dispute between editors.
* Files that should not be replaced, such as images used in the interface or transcluded to the main page.
* Files that should not be replaced, such as images used in the interface or transcluded to the main page.
Line 175: Line 175:


=== Pending changes protection ===
=== Pending changes protection ===
{{see|Wikipedia:Pending changes}}
{{see|Stiles.casa Wiki:Pending changes}}
[[File:Pending-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=White padlock|link=]]
[[File:Pending-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=White padlock|link=]]
{{Policy shortcut|WP:PCPP|WP:WHITELOCK}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:PCPP|SW:WHITELOCK}}


Pending changes protection is a tool used to suppress [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and certain other persistent problems while allowing all users to continue to submit edits. Pending changes protection can be used as an alternative to semi-protection to allow unregistered and new users to edit pages, while keeping the edits hidden from most readers until those changes are accepted by a [[WP:RPC|pending changes reviewer]].
Pending changes protection is a tool used to suppress [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Vandalism|vandalism]] and certain other persistent problems while allowing all users to continue to submit edits. Pending changes protection can be used as an alternative to semi-protection to allow unregistered and new users to edit pages, while keeping the edits hidden from most readers until those changes are accepted by a [[SW:RPC|pending changes reviewer]].


When a page under pending changes protection is edited by an [[WP:IP|unregistered]] (IP addresses) editor or a [[Wikipedia:User access levels#New users|new user]], the edit is not directly visible to the majority of Wikipedia readers, until it is reviewed and accepted by an editor with the [[Wikipedia:User access levels#Pending changes reviewer|pending changes reviewer right]]. When a page under pending changes protection is edited by an [[Wikipedia:User access levels#Autoconfirmed users|autoconfirmed user]], the edit will be immediately visible to Wikipedia readers, unless there are pending edits waiting to be reviewed.
When a page under pending changes protection is edited by an [[SW:IP|unregistered]] (IP addresses) editor or a [[Stiles.casa Wiki:User access levels#New users|new user]], the edit is not directly visible to the majority of Stiles.casa Wiki readers, until it is reviewed and accepted by an editor with the [[Stiles.casa Wiki:User access levels#Pending changes reviewer|pending changes reviewer right]]. When a page under pending changes protection is edited by an [[Stiles.casa Wiki:User access levels#Autoconfirmed users|autoconfirmed user]], the edit will be immediately visible to Stiles.casa Wiki readers, unless there are pending edits waiting to be reviewed.


Pending changes are visible in the page history, where they are marked as pending review. Readers that are ''not logged in'' (the vast majority of readers) are shown the latest ''accepted'' version of the page; ''logged-in'' users see the latest version of the page, with all changes (reviewed or not) applied. When editors who are not reviewers make changes to an article with unreviewed pending changes, their edits are also marked as pending and are not visible to most readers.
Pending changes are visible in the page history, where they are marked as pending review. Readers that are ''not logged in'' (the vast majority of readers) are shown the latest ''accepted'' version of the page; ''logged-in'' users see the latest version of the page, with all changes (reviewed or not) applied. When editors who are not reviewers make changes to an article with unreviewed pending changes, their edits are also marked as pending and are not visible to most readers.
Line 187: Line 187:
A user who clicks "edit this page" is always, at that point, shown the latest version of the page for editing ''regardless of whether the user is logged in or not''.
A user who clicks "edit this page" is always, at that point, shown the latest version of the page for editing ''regardless of whether the user is logged in or not''.
*If the editor is not logged in, their changes join any other changes to the article awaiting review{{snd}}for the present they remain hidden from not-logged-in users. (This means that when the editor looks at the article after saving, the editor won't see the change made.)
*If the editor is not logged in, their changes join any other changes to the article awaiting review{{snd}}for the present they remain hidden from not-logged-in users. (This means that when the editor looks at the article after saving, the editor won't see the change made.)
*If the editor is logged in and a pending changes reviewer, and there are pending changes, the editor will be prompted to review the pending changes before editing{{snd}}see [[Wikipedia:Pending changes]].
*If the editor is logged in and a pending changes reviewer, and there are pending changes, the editor will be prompted to review the pending changes before editing{{snd}}see [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Pending changes]].
*If the editor is logged in and not a pending changes reviewer, then{{nbsp}}...
*If the editor is logged in and not a pending changes reviewer, then{{nbsp}}...
**If there are no unreviewed pending edits waiting, this editor's edits will be visible to everyone immediately; but
**If there are no unreviewed pending edits waiting, this editor's edits will be visible to everyone immediately; but
Line 197: Line 197:
Pending changes may be used to protect articles against:
Pending changes may be used to protect articles against:
* Persistent vandalism
* Persistent vandalism
* Violations of the [[Wikipedia:biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons]] policy
* Violations of the [[Stiles.casa Wiki:biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons]] policy
* [[WP:CV|Copyright violations]]
* [[SW:CV|Copyright violations]]


Pending changes protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against violations that have not yet occurred. Like semi-protection, PC protection should '''never''' be used in genuine content disputes, where there is a risk of placing a particular group of editors (unregistered users) at a disadvantage. Pending changes protection should not be used on articles with a very high edit rate, even if they meet the aforementioned criteria. Instead, semi-protection should be considered.
Pending changes protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against violations that have not yet occurred. Like semi-protection, PC protection should '''never''' be used in genuine content disputes, where there is a risk of placing a particular group of editors (unregistered users) at a disadvantage. Pending changes protection should not be used on articles with a very high edit rate, even if they meet the aforementioned criteria. Instead, semi-protection should be considered.
Line 204: Line 204:
In addition, administrators may apply temporary pending changes protection on pages that are subject to significant but temporary vandalism or disruption (for example, due to media attention) when blocking individual users is not a feasible option. As with other forms of protection, the time frame of the protection should be proportional to the problem. Indefinite PC protection should be used only in cases of severe long-term disruption.
In addition, administrators may apply temporary pending changes protection on pages that are subject to significant but temporary vandalism or disruption (for example, due to media attention) when blocking individual users is not a feasible option. As with other forms of protection, the time frame of the protection should be proportional to the problem. Indefinite PC protection should be used only in cases of severe long-term disruption.


Removal of pending changes protection can be requested of any administrator, or at [[Wikipedia:RFUP|requests for unprotection]].
Removal of pending changes protection can be requested of any administrator, or at [[Stiles.casa Wiki:RFUP|requests for unprotection]].


{{anchor|Reviewing}}The reviewing process is described in detail at [[Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes]].
{{anchor|Reviewing}}The reviewing process is described in detail at [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Reviewing pending changes]].


{{Clear}}{{anchor|30/500|extended}}{{anchor|Arbitration 30/500 protection}}<!--former tags allow section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
{{Clear}}{{anchor|30/500|extended}}{{anchor|Arbitration 30/500 protection}}<!--former tags allow section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
Line 212: Line 212:
=== Extended confirmed protection ===
=== Extended confirmed protection ===


{{see also|Wikipedia:Rough guide to extended confirmed protection}}
{{see also|Stiles.casa Wiki:Rough guide to extended confirmed protection}}
[[File:Extended-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Dark blue padlock|link=]]
[[File:Extended-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Dark blue padlock|link=]]
{{policy shortcut|WP:ECP|WP:BLUELOCK}}
{{policy shortcut|SW:ECP|SW:BLUELOCK}}
Extended confirmed protection, also known as 30/500 protection, only allows edits by editors with the [[Wikipedia:User access levels#Extendedconfirmed|extended confirmed]] user access level, granted automatically to registered users with at least 30 days' tenure and more than 500 edits.
Extended confirmed protection, also known as 30/500 protection, only allows edits by editors with the [[Stiles.casa Wiki:User access levels#Extendedconfirmed|extended confirmed]] user access level, granted automatically to registered users with at least 30 days' tenure and more than 500 edits.


Where semi-protection has proven to be ineffective, administrators may use extended confirmed protection to combat disruption (such as [[WP:VD|vandalism]], abusive [[WP:SOCK|sockpuppetry]], [[WP:WAR|edit wars]], etc.) on any topic. Extended confirmed protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against disruption that has not yet occurred, nor should it be used to privilege extended confirmed users over unregistered/new users in valid content disputes on articles not covered by Arbitration Committee 30/500 rulings. Extended confirmed protection may be applied at the discretion of an administrator when creation-protecting a page.<ref name="ECPRFC2">[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Extended confirmed protection policy 2]]</ref> [[WP:HRT|High-risk templates]] may be extended-confirmed protected at administrator discretion when template protection would be too restrictive and semi-protection would be ineffective to stop widespread disruption.<ref>[[Special:Diff/1042239556#Should_we_use_ECP_on_templates?|Should we use ECP on templates?]] discussion at the village pump.</ref>
Where semi-protection has proven to be ineffective, administrators may use extended confirmed protection to combat disruption (such as [[SW:VD|vandalism]], abusive [[SW:SOCK|sockpuppetry]], [[SW:WAR|edit wars]], etc.) on any topic. Extended confirmed protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against disruption that has not yet occurred, nor should it be used to privilege extended confirmed users over unregistered/new users in valid content disputes on articles not covered by Arbitration Committee 30/500 rulings. Extended confirmed protection may be applied at the discretion of an administrator when creation-protecting a page.<ref name="ECPRFC2">[[Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for comment/Extended confirmed protection policy 2]]</ref> [[SW:HRT|High-risk templates]] may be extended-confirmed protected at administrator discretion when template protection would be too restrictive and semi-protection would be ineffective to stop widespread disruption.<ref>[[Special:Diff/1042239556#Should_we_use_ECP_on_templates?|Should we use ECP on templates?]] discussion at the village pump.</ref>


Until August 12, 2016,<ref> [[Special:Permalink/734196666|Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Extended confirmed protection policy]]</ref> 30/500 protection applied only in topic areas determined by the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]], which authorized its use on articles reasonably construed as belonging to the [[Arab{{ndash}}Israeli conflict]];<ref>[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 4#ARBPIA General Sanctions]] (Note: This sanction was originally authorised in [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3#Remedies|Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3]]).</ref> as an arbitration enforcement tool by motion or remedy;<ref name="AE-ECP">[[Special:Permalink/720421803#Arbitration motions regarding extended confirmed protection|Arbitration motions regarding extended confirmed protection]]</ref> or as a result of community consensus.<ref>[[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 129#New usergroup with autopromotion to implement arbitration "30-500" bans as a page protection]]</ref> In February 2019, the community authorized uninvolved administrators to place pages reasonably construed as belonging to the [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/India–Pakistan conflict|India–Pakistan conflict]] under extended confirmed protection as part of a general sanctions regime.<ref>[[Special:Permalink/884689437#Proposal:_Extended-confirmed_protection_for_India-Pakistan_conflict|AN discussion authorizing India-Pakistan general prohibition]]</ref> In May 2020 the Arbitration Committee authorized extended confirmed protection to pages related to the history of Jews and [[antisemitism in Poland]] during World War II (1933–1945).<ref>[[Special:Permalink/959828754#Antisemitism in Poland: Motion (May 2020)|Antisemitism in Poland: Motion (May 2020)]]</ref>
Until August 12, 2016,<ref> [[Special:Permalink/734196666|Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for comment/Extended confirmed protection policy]]</ref> 30/500 protection applied only in topic areas determined by the [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]], which authorized its use on articles reasonably construed as belonging to the [[Arab{{ndash}}Israeli conflict]];<ref>[[Stiles.casa Wiki:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 4#ARBPIA General Sanctions]] (Note: This sanction was originally authorised in [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3#Remedies|Stiles.casa Wiki:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3]]).</ref> as an arbitration enforcement tool by motion or remedy;<ref name="AE-ECP">[[Special:Permalink/720421803#Arbitration motions regarding extended confirmed protection|Arbitration motions regarding extended confirmed protection]]</ref> or as a result of community consensus.<ref>[[Stiles.casa Wiki:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 129#New usergroup with autopromotion to implement arbitration "30-500" bans as a page protection]]</ref> In February 2019, the community authorized uninvolved administrators to place pages reasonably construed as belonging to the [[Stiles.casa Wiki:General sanctions/India–Pakistan conflict|India–Pakistan conflict]] under extended confirmed protection as part of a general sanctions regime.<ref>[[Special:Permalink/884689437#Proposal:_Extended-confirmed_protection_for_India-Pakistan_conflict|AN discussion authorizing India-Pakistan general prohibition]]</ref> In May 2020 the Arbitration Committee authorized extended confirmed protection to pages related to the history of Jews and [[antisemitism in Poland]] during World War II (1933–1945).<ref>[[Special:Permalink/959828754#Antisemitism in Poland: Motion (May 2020)|Antisemitism in Poland: Motion (May 2020)]]</ref>


As of September 23, 2016, a bot posts a notification in a subsection of [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Pages_recently_put_under_extended-confirmed_protection|AN]] when this protection level is used.<ref>[[Special:Diff/740835205|Wikipedia talk:Protection Policy discussion to remove manual posting requirement]]</ref> Any protection made as arbitration enforcement must be logged at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log]]. A full list of the {{User:MusikBot/ECPMonitor/Total}} pages under 30/500 protection can be found <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:ProtectedPages|level=extendedconfirmed}} here]</span>.
As of September 23, 2016, a bot posts a notification in a subsection of [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard#Pages_recently_put_under_extended-confirmed_protection|AN]] when this protection level is used.<ref>[[Special:Diff/740835205|Stiles.casa Wiki talk:Protection Policy discussion to remove manual posting requirement]]</ref> Any protection made as arbitration enforcement must be logged at [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Arbitration enforcement log]]. A full list of the {{User:MusikBot/ECPMonitor/Total}} pages under 30/500 protection can be found <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:ProtectedPages|level=extendedconfirmed}} here]</span>.


Users can request edits to an extended confirmed-protected page by proposing them on its talk page, using the {{Tlx|Edit extended-protected}} template if necessary to gain attention.
Users can request edits to an extended confirmed-protected page by proposing them on its talk page, using the {{Tlx|Edit extended-protected}} template if necessary to gain attention.
Line 227: Line 227:


=== Office actions ===
=== Office actions ===
{{see also|Wikipedia:Office actions}}
{{see also|Stiles.casa Wiki:Office actions}}
[[File:Office-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Black padlock|link=]]
[[File:Office-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Black padlock|link=]]
{{policy shortcut|WP:WMF-PRO|WP:BLACKLOCK}}
{{policy shortcut|SW:WMF-PRO|SW:BLACKLOCK}}


As outlined in [[Meta:Office actions#Use of advanced rights by Foundation staff|Meta-Wiki:Office actions#Use of advanced rights by Foundation staff]], pages may be protected by [[Wikipedia:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] staff in response to issues such as copyright infringement or libel. '''Such actions override community consensus'''. Administrators should '''not''' edit or unprotect such pages without permission from Wikimedia Foundation staff.<ref>Unlike with [[WP:SUPERPROTECT]], admins ''technically'' can still edit or unprotect these pages, however, they should not do so without permission.</ref>
As outlined in [[Meta:Office actions#Use of advanced rights by Foundation staff|Meta-Wiki:Office actions#Use of advanced rights by Foundation staff]], pages may be protected by [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] staff in response to issues such as copyright infringement or libel. '''Such actions override community consensus'''. Administrators should '''not''' edit or unprotect such pages without permission from Wikimedia Foundation staff.<ref>Unlike with [[SW:SUPERPROTECT]], admins ''technically'' can still edit or unprotect these pages, however, they should not do so without permission.</ref>


{{anchor|cascade}}<!--former tag allows section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
{{anchor|cascade}}<!--former tag allows section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->


=== Cascading protection ===
=== Cascading protection ===
{{redirect|WP:CASCADE|text=You may also be looking for [[Help:Cascading Style Sheets]] or [[Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items]].}}
{{redirect|SW:CASCADE|text=You may also be looking for [[Help:Cascading Style Sheets]] or [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Cascade-protected items]].}}
[[File:Cascade-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Turquoise padlock|link=]]
[[File:Cascade-protection-shackle.svg|64px|upright=0.4|right|alt=Turquoise padlock|link=]]
{{Policy shortcut|WP:CASCADE|WP:TURQUOISELOCK}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:CASCADE|SW:TURQUOISELOCK}}
Cascading protection fully protects a page, and extends that full protection ''automatically'' to any page that is [[Wikipedia:Transclusion|transcluded]] onto the protected page, whether directly or indirectly. This includes templates, images and other media that are hosted on the English Wikipedia. Files stored on Commons are ''not'' protected by any other wiki's cascading protection and, if they are to be protected, must be either temporarily uploaded to the English Wikipedia or explicitly protected at Commons (whether manually or through cascading protection there). When operational, [[c:User:KrinkleBot|KrinkleBot]] cascade-protects Commons files transcluded at [[Wikipedia:Main Page/Tomorrow]], [[Wikipedia:Main Page/Commons media protection]] and [[Main Page]]. As the bot's response time varies, media should ''not'' be transcluded on the main page (or its constituent templates) until after it has been protected. (This is particularly relevant to [[Template:In the news]], for which upcoming images are not queued at [[Wikipedia:Main Page/Tomorrow]].) Cascading protection:
Cascading protection fully protects a page, and extends that full protection ''automatically'' to any page that is [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Transclusion|transcluded]] onto the protected page, whether directly or indirectly. This includes templates, images and other media that are hosted on the English Stiles.casa Wiki. Files stored on Commons are ''not'' protected by any other wiki's cascading protection and, if they are to be protected, must be either temporarily uploaded to the English Stiles.casa Wiki or explicitly protected at Commons (whether manually or through cascading protection there). When operational, [[c:User:KrinkleBot|KrinkleBot]] cascade-protects Commons files transcluded at [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Main Page/Tomorrow]], [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Main Page/Commons media protection]] and [[Main Page]]. As the bot's response time varies, media should ''not'' be transcluded on the main page (or its constituent templates) until after it has been protected. (This is particularly relevant to [[Template:In the news]], for which upcoming images are not queued at [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Main Page/Tomorrow]].) Cascading protection:
*Should be used only to prevent [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] when placed on particularly visible pages, such as the main page.
*Should be used only to prevent [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Vandalism|vandalism]] when placed on particularly visible pages, such as the main page.
*Is available only for fully protected pages; it is disabled for lower levels of protection as it represents a workflow flaw. See [[#Cascading semi-protection|below]] as well as [[Phabricator:T10796|this bug ticket]] for more information.
*Is available only for fully protected pages; it is disabled for lower levels of protection as it represents a workflow flaw. See [[#Cascading semi-protection|below]] as well as [[Phabricator:T10796|this bug ticket]] for more information.
*Is not instantaneous; it may be several hours before it takes effect. See [[Phabricator:T20483]] for more information.
*Is not instantaneous; it may be several hours before it takes effect. See [[Phabricator:T20483]] for more information.
*Should generally not be applied directly to templates or [[WP:LUA|modules]], as it will not protect transclusions inside {{tag|includeonly|o}} tags or transclusions that depend on template parameters, but ''will'' protect the [[Wikipedia:Template documentation|documentation subpage]]. {{Xref|See {{slink||Protection of templates}} below}}, for alternatives.
*Should generally not be applied directly to templates or [[SW:LUA|modules]], as it will not protect transclusions inside {{tag|includeonly|o}} tags or transclusions that depend on template parameters, but ''will'' protect the [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Template documentation|documentation subpage]]. {{Xref|See {{slink||Protection of templates}} below}}, for alternatives.


The list of cascading-protected pages can be found at [[Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items]]. Requests to add or remove cascading protection on a page should be made at [[Wikipedia talk:Cascade-protected items]] as an [[Wikipedia:Edit requests|edit request]].
The list of cascading-protected pages can be found at [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Cascade-protected items]]. Requests to add or remove cascading protection on a page should be made at [[Stiles.casa Wiki talk:Cascade-protected items]] as an [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Edit requests|edit request]].


== Former deleted protections ==
== Former deleted protections ==
=== Superprotect ===
=== Superprotect ===
{{shortcut|WP:SUPERPROTECT}}
{{shortcut|SW:SUPERPROTECT}}
{{See also2|[[meta:Superprotect|Meta-Wiki:Superprotect]]}}
{{See also2|[[meta:Superprotect|Meta-Wiki:Superprotect]]}}
Superprotect was a level of protection, allowing editing only by [{{fullurl:Special:GlobalUsers|group=staff}} Wikimedia Foundation employees who are in the Staff global group]. It was [[gerrit:153302|implemented on August 10, 2014]] and used the same day to override community consensus regarding the use of the Media Viewer on the [[German Wikipedia]]'s primary site JavaScript, [[:de:MediaWiki:Common.js|common.js]]. It was never used on the English Wikipedia. On November 5, 2015, the WMF decided to [[mw:WMF product development process/2015-11-05|remove]] superprotect from all Wikimedia wikis.
Superprotect was a level of protection, allowing editing only by [{{fullurl:Special:GlobalUsers|group=staff}} Wikimedia Foundation employees who are in the Staff global group]. It was [[gerrit:153302|implemented on August 10, 2014]] and used the same day to override community consensus regarding the use of the Media Viewer on the [[German Stiles.casa Wiki]]'s primary site JavaScript, [[:de:MediaWiki:Common.js|common.js]]. It was never used on the English Stiles.casa Wiki. On November 5, 2015, the WMF decided to [[mw:WMF product development process/2015-11-05|remove]] superprotect from all Wikimedia wikis.


==== Restricted namespace protections ====
==== Restricted namespace protections ====
The <code>Gadget</code> and <code>Gadget definition</code> namespaces have namespace-wide protection, and the permissions to edit them are only available to WMF Staff.  There is one page on the English Wikipedia in these namespaces. A [[phab:T229735|request]] for local access to this namespace has been pending since 2019.
The <code>Gadget</code> and <code>Gadget definition</code> namespaces have namespace-wide protection, and the permissions to edit them are only available to WMF Staff.  There is one page on the English Stiles.casa Wiki in these namespaces. A [[phab:T229735|request]] for local access to this namespace has been pending since 2019.


=== Cascading semi-protection ===
=== Cascading semi-protection ===
Line 260: Line 260:


=== Pending changes protection level&nbsp;2 ===
=== Pending changes protection level&nbsp;2 ===
{{Shortcut|WP:ORANGELOCK}}
{{Shortcut|SW:ORANGELOCK}}
Originally, two levels of pending changes protection existed, where level{{nbsp}}2 required edits by all users who are not [[WP:Reviewing pending changes|pending changes reviewers]] to be reviewed. Following a community discussion, level{{nbsp}}2 was retired from the English Wikipedia in January 2017. It was suggested then that "Pending changes level{{nbsp}}1" be referred to in the future as simply "Pending changes".<ref>[[Special:Permalink/762319924#Make PC2 no longer available to admins|VPR RfC to remove PC2]]</ref>
Originally, two levels of pending changes protection existed, where level{{nbsp}}2 required edits by all users who are not [[SW:Reviewing pending changes|pending changes reviewers]] to be reviewed. Following a community discussion, level{{nbsp}}2 was retired from the English Stiles.casa Wiki in January 2017. It was suggested then that "Pending changes level{{nbsp}}1" be referred to in the future as simply "Pending changes".<ref>[[Special:Permalink/762319924#Make PC2 no longer available to admins|VPR RfC to remove PC2]]</ref>


== Protection by namespace ==
== Protection by namespace ==
{{Policy shortcut|WP:PROTNS}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:PROTNS}}


=== <span id="Talk pages"></span>Article talk pages ===
=== <span id="Talk pages"></span>Article talk pages ===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:ATPROT}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:ATPROT}}
{{anchor|full-talk}}<!--former tag allows section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
{{anchor|full-talk}}<!--former tag allows section referencing while accommodating section name changes. DO NOT REMOVE IT.-->
Modifications to a protected page can be proposed on its [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk page]] (or at another appropriate forum) for discussion. Administrators can make changes to the protected article reflecting [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. Placing the {{tlx|Edit protected}} template on the talk page will draw the attention of administrators for implementing uncontroversial changes.
Modifications to a protected page can be proposed on its [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Talk page|talk page]] (or at another appropriate forum) for discussion. Administrators can make changes to the protected article reflecting [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Consensus|consensus]]. Placing the {{tlx|Edit protected}} template on the talk page will draw the attention of administrators for implementing uncontroversial changes.


Talk pages are not usually protected, and are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of vandalism.
Talk pages are not usually protected, and are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of vandalism.


=== User talk pages ===
=== User talk pages ===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:UTPROT}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:UTPROT}}
User talk pages are rarely protected. However, protection may be applied if there is severe vandalism or abuse. Users whose talk pages are protected may wish to have an unprotected user talk subpage linked conspicuously from their main talk page to allow good-faith comments from users that the protection restricts editing from.
User talk pages are rarely protected. However, protection may be applied if there is severe vandalism or abuse. Users whose talk pages are protected may wish to have an unprotected user talk subpage linked conspicuously from their main talk page to allow good-faith comments from users that the protection restricts editing from.


Line 282: Line 282:
Blocked users' user talk pages should not ordinarily be protected, as this interferes with the user's ability to contest their block through the normal process. It also prevents others from being able to use the talk page to communicate with the blocked editor.
Blocked users' user talk pages should not ordinarily be protected, as this interferes with the user's ability to contest their block through the normal process. It also prevents others from being able to use the talk page to communicate with the blocked editor.


In extreme cases of abuse by the blocked user, such as abuse of the {{tl|unblock}} template, re-blocking the user with talk page access removed should be preferred over applying protection to the page. If the user has been blocked and with the ability to edit their user talk page disabled, they should be informed of this in a block notice, subsequent notice, or message, and it should include information and instructions for appealing their block off-wiki, such as through the [[WP:UTRS|UTRS tool interface]] or, as a last recourse, [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block#Routes to unblock|the Arbitration Committee]].
In extreme cases of abuse by the blocked user, such as abuse of the {{tl|unblock}} template, re-blocking the user with talk page access removed should be preferred over applying protection to the page. If the user has been blocked and with the ability to edit their user talk page disabled, they should be informed of this in a block notice, subsequent notice, or message, and it should include information and instructions for appealing their block off-wiki, such as through the [[SW:UTRS|UTRS tool interface]] or, as a last recourse, [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Appealing a block#Routes to unblock|the Arbitration Committee]].


When required, protection should be implemented for only a brief period, not exceeding the duration of the block.
When required, protection should be implemented for only a brief period, not exceeding the duration of the block.


Confirmed socks of registered users should be dealt with in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry]]; their pages are not normally protected.
Confirmed socks of registered users should be dealt with in accordance with [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Sockpuppetry]]; their pages are not normally protected.


=== User pages ===
=== User pages ===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:UPROT|WP:UPPROT}}
{{Policy shortcut|SW:UPROT|SW:UPPROT}}


Base user pages (for example, the page User:Example, and not User:Example/subpage or User talk:Example) are automatically protected from creation or editing by unconfirmed accounts and anonymous IP users. An exception to this includes an unconfirmed registered account attempting to create or edit their own user page. IP editors and unconfirmed accounts are also unable to create or edit user pages that do not belong to a currently-registered account. This protection is enforced by [[Special:AbuseFilter/803|an edit filter]].<ref>Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Protect user pages by default]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Protect user pages by default|its talk page]] for community discussion related to a preventative measure for user pages.</ref> Users may opt-out of this protection by placing {{tlx|unlocked userpage}} anywhere on their own user page.
Base user pages (for example, the page User:Example, and not User:Example/subpage or User talk:Example) are automatically protected from creation or editing by unconfirmed accounts and anonymous IP users. An exception to this includes an unconfirmed registered account attempting to create or edit their own user page. IP editors and unconfirmed accounts are also unable to create or edit user pages that do not belong to a currently-registered account. This protection is enforced by [[Special:AbuseFilter/803|an edit filter]].<ref>Please refer to [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for comment/Protect user pages by default]] and [[Stiles.casa Wiki talk:Requests for comment/Protect user pages by default|its talk page]] for community discussion related to a preventative measure for user pages.</ref> Users may opt-out of this protection by placing {{tlx|unlocked userpage}} anywhere on their own user page.


[[Wikipedia:User pages|User pages]] and subpages within their own user space may be protected upon a request from the user, as long as a need exists. Pages within the user space should not be automatically or pre-emptively protected without good reason or cause.<ref>Per discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Protection policy/Archive 15#Own userspace pages protection policy]], June 2013</ref><ref>Per discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive314#Protecting an editor's user page or user space per their request]], September 2019</ref> Requests for protection specifically at uncommon levels (such as template protection<!--ArbCom 30/500 protection should possibly be mentioned here too-->) may be granted if the user has expressed a genuine and realistic need.
[[Stiles.casa Wiki:User pages|User pages]] and subpages within their own user space may be protected upon a request from the user, as long as a need exists. Pages within the user space should not be automatically or pre-emptively protected without good reason or cause.<ref>Per discussion at [[Stiles.casa Wiki talk:Protection policy/Archive 15#Own userspace pages protection policy]], June 2013</ref><ref>Per discussion at [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive314#Protecting an editor's user page or user space per their request]], September 2019</ref> Requests for protection specifically at uncommon levels (such as template protection<!--ArbCom 30/500 protection should possibly be mentioned here too-->) may be granted if the user has expressed a genuine and realistic need.


When a filter is insufficient to stop user page vandalism, a user may choose to create a ".css" subpage (ex. User:Example/Userpage.css), copy all the contents of their user page onto the subpage, transclude the subpage by putting {{tlf|User:Example/Userpage.css}} on their user page, and then ask an administrator to fully protect their user page. Because user space pages that end in ".css", ".js", and ".json" are editable only by the user to which that user space belongs (and interface administrators), this will protect your user page from further vandalism.
When a filter is insufficient to stop user page vandalism, a user may choose to create a ".css" subpage (ex. User:Example/Userpage.css), copy all the contents of their user page onto the subpage, transclude the subpage by putting {{tlf|User:Example/Userpage.css}} on their user page, and then ask an administrator to fully protect their user page. Because user space pages that end in ".css", ".js", and ".json" are editable only by the user to which that user space belongs (and interface administrators), this will protect your user page from further vandalism.


==== Deceased users ====
==== Deceased users ====
{{See also|Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians/Guidelines}}
{{See also|Stiles.casa Wiki:Deceased Stiles.casa Wikins/Guidelines}}


In the event of the confirmed death of a user, the user's user page (but not the user talk page) should be fully protected.
In the event of the confirmed death of a user, the user's user page (but not the user talk page) should be fully protected.


=== Protection of templates ===
=== Protection of templates ===
{{shortcut|WP:PTPROT}}
{{shortcut|SW:PTPROT}}
{{see also|Wikipedia:High-risk templates|Wikipedia:Template documentation}}
{{see also|Stiles.casa Wiki:High-risk templates|Stiles.casa Wiki:Template documentation}}
Highly visible templates{{snd}}those used on a large number of pages or frequently substituted{{snd}}are often edit protected based on the degree of visibility, type of use, content, and other considerations.
Highly visible templates{{snd}}those used on a large number of pages or frequently substituted{{snd}}are often edit protected based on the degree of visibility, type of use, content, and other considerations.


Protected templates should normally have the {{tl|documentation}} template. It loads the unprotected <code>/doc</code> page, so that non-admins and IP-users can edit the documentation, categories and interwiki links. It also automatically adds {{tl|pp-template}} to protected templates, which displays a small padlock in the top right corner and categorizes the template as protected. Only manually add {{tlf|pp-template}} to protected templates that don't use {{tlf|documentation}} (mostly the flag templates).
Protected templates should normally have the {{tl|documentation}} template. It loads the unprotected <code>/doc</code> page, so that non-admins and IP-users can edit the documentation, categories and interwiki links. It also automatically adds {{tl|pp-template}} to protected templates, which displays a small padlock in the top right corner and categorizes the template as protected. Only manually add {{tlf|pp-template}} to protected templates that don't use {{tlf|documentation}} (mostly the flag templates).


Cascading protection should generally not be applied directly to templates, as it will not protect transclusions inside {{tag|includeonly|o}} tags or transclusions that depend on template parameters, but ''will'' protect the template's [[Wikipedia:Template documentation|documentation subpage]]. Instead, consider any of the following:
Cascading protection should generally not be applied directly to templates, as it will not protect transclusions inside {{tag|includeonly|o}} tags or transclusions that depend on template parameters, but ''will'' protect the template's [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Template documentation|documentation subpage]]. Instead, consider any of the following:
* If the set of subtemplates is static (even if large), protect them using normal protection mechanisms.
* If the set of subtemplates is static (even if large), protect them using normal protection mechanisms.
* If the set of subtemplates is unbounded, use [[MediaWiki:Titleblacklist]] to protect all subtemplates using a particular naming format (as is done for [[WP:Editnotice|editnotice templates]] and subtemplates of [[Template:TFA title]]).
* If the set of subtemplates is unbounded, use [[MediaWiki:Titleblacklist]] to protect all subtemplates using a particular naming format (as is done for [[SW:Editnotice|editnotice templates]] and subtemplates of [[Template:TFA title]]).


Note: All [[WP:Editnotice|editnotice templates]] (except those in userspace) are already protected via [[MediaWiki:Titleblacklist]]. They can be edited by admins, [[WP:Template editor|template editors]] and [[WP:Page mover|page movers]] only.
Note: All [[SW:Editnotice|editnotice templates]] (except those in userspace) are already protected via [[MediaWiki:Titleblacklist]]. They can be edited by admins, [[SW:Template editor|template editors]] and [[SW:Page mover|page movers]] only.


=== Sandboxes ===
=== Sandboxes ===
{{see also|Wikipedia:About the sandbox}}
{{see also|Stiles.casa Wiki:About the sandbox}}


Sandboxes should not ordinarily be protected since their purpose is to let new users test and experiment with [[Help:wiki markup|wiki syntax]]. Most sandboxes are automatically cleaned every 12 hours, although they are frequently overwritten by other testing users. The [[Wikipedia:Sandbox]] is cleaned every hour. Those who use sandboxes for malicious purposes, or to violate policies such as [[Wikipedia:no personal attacks|no personal attacks]], [[Wikipedia:civility|civility]], or [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyrights]], should instead be warned and/or blocked.
Sandboxes should not ordinarily be protected since their purpose is to let new users test and experiment with [[Help:wiki markup|wiki syntax]]. Most sandboxes are automatically cleaned every 12 hours, although they are frequently overwritten by other testing users. The [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Sandbox]] is cleaned every hour. Those who use sandboxes for malicious purposes, or to violate policies such as [[Stiles.casa Wiki:no personal attacks|no personal attacks]], [[Stiles.casa Wiki:civility|civility]], or [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Copyrights|copyrights]], should instead be warned and/or blocked.


== Available templates ==
== Available templates ==
Line 331: Line 331:
* [[Special:ProtectedPages]]
* [[Special:ProtectedPages]]
* [[Special:ProtectedTitles]]
* [[Special:ProtectedTitles]]
* [[Wikipedia:Edit lock]]
* [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Edit lock]]
* [[Wikipedia:List of indefinitely protected pages]]
* [[Stiles.casa Wiki:List of indefinitely protected pages]]
* [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection]]
* [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for page protection]]
* [[Wikipedia:Rough guide to semi-protection]]
* [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Rough guide to semi-protection]]
* [[Wikipedia:Make protection requests sparingly]], an essay
* [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Make protection requests sparingly]], an essay
* [[m:Protected pages considered harmful|Meta-Wiki:Protected pages considered harmful]]
* [[m:Protected pages considered harmful|Meta-Wiki:Protected pages considered harmful]]
* [[m:The Wrong Version|Meta-Wiki:The Wrong Version]]
* [[m:The Wrong Version|Meta-Wiki:The Wrong Version]]
* [[Wikipedia:Protection policy/Padlocks]]
* [[Stiles.casa Wiki:Protection policy/Padlocks]]


== Notes ==
== Notes ==
Line 344: Line 344:


{{New admin school|state=collapsed}}
{{New admin school|state=collapsed}}
{{Wikipedia policies and guidelines}}
{{Stiles.casa Wiki policies and guidelines}}


[[Category:Wikipedia vandalism|{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Stiles.casa Wiki vandalism|{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Wikipedia page protection|{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Stiles.casa Wiki page protection|{{PAGENAME}}]]

Latest revision as of 13:06, 11 June 2022

Gold padlock Fully-protected

Goldlock

Brown padlock Interface protected

Redlock

Pink padlock Template-protected

Pinklock

Silver padlock Semi-protected

Silverlock

Blue padlock Create protected

Skybluelock

Green padlock Move protected

Greenlock

Purple padlock Upload protected

Purplelock

White padlock Pending changes protected

Whitelock

Dark blue padlock Extended confirmed protected

Bluelock

Black padlock Protected by Office

Blacklock

Turquoise padlock Cascade protected

Turquoiselock

In some circumstances, pages may need to be protected from modification by certain groups of editors. Pages are protected when a specific damaging event has been identified that can not be prevented through other means such as a block. Otherwise, Stiles.casa Wiki is built on the principle that anyone can edit it, and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors. This policy states in detail the protection types and procedures for page protection and unprotection and when each protection should and should not be applied.

Protection is a technical restriction applied only by administrators, although any user may request protection. Protection can be indefinite or expire after a specified time. The various levels of protection are detailed below, and they can be applied to the page edit, page move, page create, and file upload actions. Even when a page is protected from editing, the source code (wikitext) of the page can still be viewed and copied by anyone.

A protected page is marked at its top right by a padlock icon, usually added by the {{pp-protected}} template.

Pre-emptive protection

Applying page protection as a preemptive measure is contrary to the open nature of Stiles.casa Wiki and is generally not allowed if applied solely for these reasons. However, brief periods of an appropriate and reasonable protection level are allowed in situations where blatant vandalism, disruption, or abuse is occurring by multiple users and at a level of frequency that requires its use in order to stop it. The duration of the protection should be set as short as possible, and the protection level should be set to the lowest restriction needed in order to stop the disruption while still allowing productive editors to make changes.

Types of protection

The following technical options are available to administrators for protecting different actions to pages:

  • Edit protection protects the page from being edited.
  • Move protection protects the page from being moved or renamed.
  • Creation protection prevents a page (normally a previously deleted one) from being created (also known as "salting").
  • Upload protection prevents new versions of a file from being uploaded, but it does not prevent editing to the file's description page (unless edit protection is applied).

The following technical options are available to administrators for adding protection levels to the different actions to pages:

  • Pending changes protection (only available for edit protection) requires any edits made to the page by unregistered users and accounts that are not confirmed to be approved by a pending changes reviewer or an administrator before the changes become visible to readers who are not logged in.
  • Semi-protection prevents the action by unregistered users and users with accounts that are not confirmed.
  • Extended confirmed protection, also known as 30/500 protection, prevents the action if the user's account has not yet reached at least 30 days of tenure, and has not made at least 500 edits on the English Stiles.casa Wiki. In most cases, it should not be a protection level of first resort, and should be used where semi-protection has proven to be ineffective. Activation or application of this protection level is logged at the Administrators' noticeboard.
  • Template protection prevents the action by everyone except template editors and administrators (who have this right as part of their toolset).
  • Full protection prevents the action by everyone except administrators.

Any type of protection (with the exception of cascading protection) may be requested at Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for page protection. Changes to a fully protected page should be proposed on the corresponding talk page, then carried out by an administrator if they are uncontroversial or there is consensus for them.

Except in the case of office actions (see below), Arbitration Committee remedies, or pages in the MediaWiki namespace (see below), administrators may unprotect a page if the reason for its protection no longer applies, a reasonable period has elapsed, and there is no consensus that continued protection is necessary. Editors desiring the unprotection of a page should, in the first instance, ask the administrator who applied the protection unless the administrator is inactive or no longer an administrator; thereafter, requests may be made at Requests for unprotection. Note that such requests will normally be declined if the protecting administrator is active and was not consulted first. A log of protections and unprotections is available at Special:Log/protect.

Interaction of Stiles.casa Wiki user groups and page protection levels
  Unregistered or Newly registered Confirmed or Auto-confirmed Extended confirmed Template editor Admin Interface admin Appropriate for
(See also: Stiles.casa Wiki:Protection policy)
No protection normal editing The vast majority of pages. This is the default protection level.
Pending-protection-shackle.svgPending changes all users can edit.
Edits by unregistered or new editors (and any subsequent edits by anyone) are hidden from readers who are not logged in, until reviewed by a pending changes reviewer or admin. Logged-in editors see all edits, whether accepted or not.
Infrequently edited pages with high levels of vandalism, BLP violations, edit-warring, or other disruption from unregistered and new users.
Semi-protection-shackle.svgSemi cannot edit normal editing Pages that have been persistently vandalized by anonymous and registered users. Some highly visible templates and modules.
Extended-protection-shackle.svgExt. confirmed cannot edit normal editing* Specific topic areas authorized by ArbCom, pages where semi-protection has failed, or high-risk templates where template protection would be too restrictive.
Template-protection-shackle.svgTemplate cannot edit normal editing High-risk or very-frequently used templates and modules. Some high-risk pages outside of template space.
Full-protection-shackle.svgFull cannot edit normal editing Articles under an edit war and content dispute, or with persistent disruption from extended confirmed accounts. Critical templates and modules.
Interface-protection-shackle.svgInterface cannot edit normal editing Scripts, stylesheets, and similar objects central to operation of the site or that are in another editor's user space.
* In order to edit through extended confirmed protection, a template editor must also be extended confirmed, but in practice this is essentially always the case.

Other modes of protection:

Full protection

Gold padlock

A fully protected page cannot be edited or moved by anyone except administrators. The protection may be for a specified time or may be indefinite.

Modifications to a fully protected page can be proposed on its talk page (or at another appropriate forum) for discussion. Administrators can make changes to the protected article reflecting consensus. Placing the {{Edit fully-protected}} template on the talk page will draw the attention of administrators for implementing uncontroversial changes.

Content disputes

While content disputes and edit warring may be addressed with user blocks issued by uninvolved administrators, allowing normal page editing by other editors at the same time, the protection policy provides an alternative approach as administrators have the discretion to temporarily fully protect an article to end an ongoing edit war. This approach may better suit multi-party disputes and contentious content, as it makes talk page consensus a requirement for implementation of requested edits.

When protecting a page because of a content dispute, administrators have a duty to avoid protecting a version that contains policy-violating content, such as vandalism, copyright violations, defamation, or poor-quality coverage of living people. Administrators are deemed to remain uninvolved when exercising discretion on whether to apply protection to the current version of an article, or to an older, stable, or pre-edit-war version.

Protected pages may not be edited except to make changes that are uncontroversial or for which there is clear consensus. Editors convinced that the protected version of an article contains policy-violating content, or that protection has rewarded edit warring or disruption by establishing a contentious revision, may identify a stable version prior to the edit war and request reversion to that version. Before making such a request, editors should consider how independent editors might view the suggestion and recognize that continuing an edit war is grounds for being blocked.

Administrators who have made substantive content changes to an article are considered involved and must not use their advanced permissions to further their own positions. When involved in a dispute, it is almost always wisest to respect the editing policies that bind all editors and call for input from an uninvolved administrator, rather than to invite controversy by acting unilaterally.

"History only" review

If a deleted page is going through deletion review, only administrators are normally capable of viewing the former content of the page. If they feel it would benefit the discussion to allow other users to view the page content, administrators may restore the page, blank it or replace the contents with {{Temporarily undeleted}} template or a similar notice, and fully protect the page to prevent further editing. The previous contents of the page are then accessible to everyone via the page history.

Protected generic file names

Generic file names such as File:Photo.jpg, File:Map.jpg, and File:Sound.wav are fully protected to prevent new versions being uploaded. Furthermore, File:Map.jpg and File:Sound.wav are salted.

Permanent protection

Brown padlock

Administrators cannot change or remove the protection for some areas on Stiles.casa Wiki, which are permanently protected by the MediaWiki software:

  • Edits to the MediaWiki namespace, which defines parts of the site interface, are restricted to administrators.
  • Edits to personal CSS and JavaScript pages such as User:Example/monobook.css and User:Example/cologneblue.js are restricted to the associated user and interface administrators. Interface administrators may edit these pages, for example, to remove a user script that has been used in an inappropriate way. Administrators may delete (but not edit or restore) these pages.
  • Edits to personal JSON pages such as User:Example/data.json are restricted to the associated user and administrators.

Such protection is called Permanent, Interface, or Indefinite protection; and pages so protected can only be edited by those with Interface Administrator rights.

In addition to hard-coded protection, the following are usually fully protected for an indefinite period of time (though not necessarily with Interface protection):

Template protection

Pink padlock

A template-protected page can be edited only by administrators or users in the ⧼group-templateeditor⧽ group. This protection level should be used almost exclusively on high-risk templates and modules. In cases where pages in other namespaces become transcluded to a very high degree, this protection level is also valid.

This is a protection level<ref>Created October 2013 as a result of Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for comment/Template editor user right‎</ref> that replaces full protection on pages that are merely protected due to high transclusion rates, rather than content disputes. It should be used on templates whose risk factor would have otherwise warranted full protection. It should not be used on less risky templates on the grounds that the template editor user right exists—the existence of the right should not result in more templates becoming uneditable for the general editing community. In borderline cases, extended confirmed protection or lower may be applied to high risk templates that the general editing community still needs to edit regularly.

Editors may request edits to a template-protected page by proposing them on its talk page, using the {{Edit template-protected}} template if necessary to gain attention.

Semi-protection

Silver padlock

Semi-protected pages cannot be edited by unregistered users (IP addresses), as well as accounts that are not confirmed or autoconfirmed (accounts that are at least four days old and have made at least ten edits to Stiles.casa Wiki). Semi-protection is useful when there is a significant amount of disruption or vandalism from new or unregistered users, or to prevent sockpuppets of blocked or banned users from editing, especially when it occurs on biographies of living persons who have had a recent high level of media interest. An alternative to semi-protection is pending changes, which is sometimes favored when an article is being vandalized regularly, but otherwise receives a low amount of editing.

Such users can request edits to a semi-protected page by proposing them on its talk page, using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template if necessary to gain attention. If the page in question and its talk page are both protected, please make your edit request at Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for page protection instead. New users may also request the confirmed user right at Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for permissions/Confirmed.

Guidance for administrators

Administrators may apply indefinite semi-protection to pages that are subject to heavy and persistent vandalism or violations of content policy (such as biographies of living persons, neutral point of view). Semi-protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred or to privilege registered users over unregistered users in (valid) content disputes.

In addition, administrators may apply temporary semi-protection on pages that are:

  • Subject to significant but temporary vandalism or disruption (for example, due to media attention) if blocking individual users is not a feasible option.
  • Subject to edit warring if all parties involved are unregistered or new editors (i.e. in cases in which full protection would otherwise be applied). This does not apply when autoconfirmed users are involved.
  • Subject to vandalism or edit warring where unregistered editors are engaging in IP hopping by using different computers, obtaining new addresses by using dynamic IP allocation, or other address-changing schemes.
  • Article discussion pages, if they have been subject to persistent disruption. Such protection should be used sparingly because it prevents unregistered and newly registered users from participating in discussions. A page and its talk page should not normally be protected at the same time. If a page and its talk page are both protected, the talk page should direct affected editors to Stiles.casa Wiki:Request for edit to ensure that no editor is entirely prevented from contributing.
  • Protection should be used sparingly on the talk pages of blocked users, including IP addresses. Instead the user should be re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. When required, or when re-blocking without talk page editing allowed is unsuccessful, protection should be implemented for only a brief period not exceeding the duration of the block.

Today's featured article may be semi-protected just like any other article. However since the article is subject to sudden spurts of vandalism during certain times of day, administrators should semi-protect it for brief periods of time in most instances. For the former guideline, see Stiles.casa Wiki:Main Page featured article protection.

Creation protection (salting)

Blue padlock

Administrators can prevent the creation of pages. This level of protection is useful for pages that have been deleted but repeatedly recreated. Such protection is case-sensitive. There are several levels of creation protection that can be applied to pages, identical to the levels for edit protection. A list of protected titles may be found at Special:ProtectedTitles (see also historical lists).

Pre-emptive restrictions on new article titles are instituted through the title blacklist system, which allows for more flexible protection with support for substrings and regular expressions.

Pages that have been creation-protected are sometimes referred to as "salted". Editors wishing to re-create a salted title with appropriate content should either contact an administrator (preferably the protecting administrator), file a request at Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for page protection#Current requests for reduction in protection level, or use the deletion review process. To make a convincing case for re-creation, it is helpful to show a draft version of the intended article when filing a request.

Administrators should choose the appropriate level of create protection—autoconfirmed, extended-confirmed,<ref name="ECPRFC2"/> or full. Due to the implementation of ACPERM, non-confirmed editors cannot create pages in mainspace; thus, semi-creation protection should be rare, used only for protection of pages outside of mainspace.

While creation-protection is usually permanent, temporary creation protection may be applied if a page is repeatedly recreated by a single user (or sockpuppets of that user, if applicable).

Move protection

Green padlock

Move-protected pages, or more technically, fully move-protected pages, cannot be moved to a new title except by an administrator. Move protection is commonly applied to:

Fully edit-protected pages are also implicitly move-protected.

As with full edit protection, protection because of edit warring should not be considered an endorsement of the current name. When move protection is applied during a requested move discussion, the page should be protected at the location it was at when the move request was started.

All files are implicitly move-protected; only file movers and administrators can rename files.

Upload protection

Purple padlock

Upload-protected files, or more technically, fully upload-protected files, cannot be replaced with new versions except by an administrator. Upload protection does not protect file pages from editing. It may be applied by an administrator to:

  • Files subject to persistent upload vandalism.
  • Files subject to a dispute between editors.
  • Files that should not be replaced, such as images used in the interface or transcluded to the main page.
  • Files with common or generic names. (e.g., File:Map.png)

As with full edit protection, administrators should avoid favoring one version over another, and protection should not be considered an endorsement of the current version. An exception to this rule is when they are protected due to upload vandalism.

Pending changes protection

White padlock

Pending changes protection is a tool used to suppress vandalism and certain other persistent problems while allowing all users to continue to submit edits. Pending changes protection can be used as an alternative to semi-protection to allow unregistered and new users to edit pages, while keeping the edits hidden from most readers until those changes are accepted by a pending changes reviewer.

When a page under pending changes protection is edited by an unregistered (IP addresses) editor or a new user, the edit is not directly visible to the majority of Stiles.casa Wiki readers, until it is reviewed and accepted by an editor with the pending changes reviewer right. When a page under pending changes protection is edited by an autoconfirmed user, the edit will be immediately visible to Stiles.casa Wiki readers, unless there are pending edits waiting to be reviewed.

Pending changes are visible in the page history, where they are marked as pending review. Readers that are not logged in (the vast majority of readers) are shown the latest accepted version of the page; logged-in users see the latest version of the page, with all changes (reviewed or not) applied. When editors who are not reviewers make changes to an article with unreviewed pending changes, their edits are also marked as pending and are not visible to most readers.

A user who clicks "edit this page" is always, at that point, shown the latest version of the page for editing regardless of whether the user is logged in or not.

  • If the editor is not logged in, their changes join any other changes to the article awaiting review – for the present they remain hidden from not-logged-in users. (This means that when the editor looks at the article after saving, the editor won't see the change made.)
  • If the editor is logged in and a pending changes reviewer, and there are pending changes, the editor will be prompted to review the pending changes before editing – see Stiles.casa Wiki:Pending changes.
  • If the editor is logged in and not a pending changes reviewer, then ...
    • If there are no unreviewed pending edits waiting, this editor's edits will be visible to everyone immediately; but
    • If there are unreviewed pending edits waiting, then this editor's edits will be visible only to other logged-in users (including themself) immediately, but not to readers not logged in.

Reviewing of pending changes should be resolved within reasonable time limits.

When to apply pending changes protection

Pending changes may be used to protect articles against:

Pending changes protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against violations that have not yet occurred. Like semi-protection, PC protection should never be used in genuine content disputes, where there is a risk of placing a particular group of editors (unregistered users) at a disadvantage. Pending changes protection should not be used on articles with a very high edit rate, even if they meet the aforementioned criteria. Instead, semi-protection should be considered.

In addition, administrators may apply temporary pending changes protection on pages that are subject to significant but temporary vandalism or disruption (for example, due to media attention) when blocking individual users is not a feasible option. As with other forms of protection, the time frame of the protection should be proportional to the problem. Indefinite PC protection should be used only in cases of severe long-term disruption.

Removal of pending changes protection can be requested of any administrator, or at requests for unprotection.

The reviewing process is described in detail at Stiles.casa Wiki:Reviewing pending changes.

Extended confirmed protection

Dark blue padlock

Extended confirmed protection, also known as 30/500 protection, only allows edits by editors with the extended confirmed user access level, granted automatically to registered users with at least 30 days' tenure and more than 500 edits.

Where semi-protection has proven to be ineffective, administrators may use extended confirmed protection to combat disruption (such as vandalism, abusive sockpuppetry, edit wars, etc.) on any topic. Extended confirmed protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against disruption that has not yet occurred, nor should it be used to privilege extended confirmed users over unregistered/new users in valid content disputes on articles not covered by Arbitration Committee 30/500 rulings. Extended confirmed protection may be applied at the discretion of an administrator when creation-protecting a page.<ref name="ECPRFC2">Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for comment/Extended confirmed protection policy 2</ref> High-risk templates may be extended-confirmed protected at administrator discretion when template protection would be too restrictive and semi-protection would be ineffective to stop widespread disruption.<ref>Should we use ECP on templates? discussion at the village pump.</ref>

Until August 12, 2016,<ref> Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for comment/Extended confirmed protection policy</ref> 30/500 protection applied only in topic areas determined by the Arbitration Committee, which authorized its use on articles reasonably construed as belonging to the Arab–Israeli conflict;<ref>Stiles.casa Wiki:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 4#ARBPIA General Sanctions (Note: This sanction was originally authorised in Stiles.casa Wiki:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3).</ref> as an arbitration enforcement tool by motion or remedy;<ref name="AE-ECP">Arbitration motions regarding extended confirmed protection</ref> or as a result of community consensus.<ref>Stiles.casa Wiki:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 129#New usergroup with autopromotion to implement arbitration "30-500" bans as a page protection</ref> In February 2019, the community authorized uninvolved administrators to place pages reasonably construed as belonging to the India–Pakistan conflict under extended confirmed protection as part of a general sanctions regime.<ref>AN discussion authorizing India-Pakistan general prohibition</ref> In May 2020 the Arbitration Committee authorized extended confirmed protection to pages related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–1945).<ref>Antisemitism in Poland: Motion (May 2020)</ref>

As of September 23, 2016, a bot posts a notification in a subsection of AN when this protection level is used.<ref>Stiles.casa Wiki talk:Protection Policy discussion to remove manual posting requirement</ref> Any protection made as arbitration enforcement must be logged at Stiles.casa Wiki:Arbitration enforcement log. A full list of the 3776 pages under 30/500 protection can be found here.

Users can request edits to an extended confirmed-protected page by proposing them on its talk page, using the {{Edit extended-protected}} template if necessary to gain attention.

Office actions

Black padlock

As outlined in Meta-Wiki:Office actions#Use of advanced rights by Foundation staff, pages may be protected by Wikimedia Foundation staff in response to issues such as copyright infringement or libel. Such actions override community consensus. Administrators should not edit or unprotect such pages without permission from Wikimedia Foundation staff.<ref>Unlike with SW:SUPERPROTECT, admins technically can still edit or unprotect these pages, however, they should not do so without permission.</ref>

Cascading protection

Turquoise padlock

Cascading protection fully protects a page, and extends that full protection automatically to any page that is transcluded onto the protected page, whether directly or indirectly. This includes templates, images and other media that are hosted on the English Stiles.casa Wiki. Files stored on Commons are not protected by any other wiki's cascading protection and, if they are to be protected, must be either temporarily uploaded to the English Stiles.casa Wiki or explicitly protected at Commons (whether manually or through cascading protection there). When operational, KrinkleBot cascade-protects Commons files transcluded at Stiles.casa Wiki:Main Page/Tomorrow, Stiles.casa Wiki:Main Page/Commons media protection and Main Page. As the bot's response time varies, media should not be transcluded on the main page (or its constituent templates) until after it has been protected. (This is particularly relevant to Template:In the news, for which upcoming images are not queued at Stiles.casa Wiki:Main Page/Tomorrow.) Cascading protection:

  • Should be used only to prevent vandalism when placed on particularly visible pages, such as the main page.
  • Is available only for fully protected pages; it is disabled for lower levels of protection as it represents a workflow flaw. See below as well as this bug ticket for more information.
  • Is not instantaneous; it may be several hours before it takes effect. See Phabricator:T20483 for more information.
  • Should generally not be applied directly to templates or modules, as it will not protect transclusions inside <includeonly> tags or transclusions that depend on template parameters, but will protect the documentation subpage. See Stiles Wiki:Protection policy § Notes below, for alternatives.

The list of cascading-protected pages can be found at Stiles.casa Wiki:Cascade-protected items. Requests to add or remove cascading protection on a page should be made at Stiles.casa Wiki talk:Cascade-protected items as an edit request.

Former deleted protections

Superprotect

Superprotect was a level of protection, allowing editing only by Wikimedia Foundation employees who are in the Staff global group. It was implemented on August 10, 2014 and used the same day to override community consensus regarding the use of the Media Viewer on the German Stiles.casa Wiki's primary site JavaScript, common.js. It was never used on the English Stiles.casa Wiki. On November 5, 2015, the WMF decided to remove superprotect from all Wikimedia wikis.

Restricted namespace protections

The Gadget and Gadget definition namespaces have namespace-wide protection, and the permissions to edit them are only available to WMF Staff. There is one page on the English Stiles.casa Wiki in these namespaces. A request for local access to this namespace has been pending since 2019.

Cascading semi-protection

Cascading semi-protection was formerly possible, but it was disabled in 2007 after users noticed that non-administrators could fully protect any page by transcluding it onto the page to which cascading semi-protection had been applied by an administrator.

Pending changes protection level 2

Originally, two levels of pending changes protection existed, where level 2 required edits by all users who are not pending changes reviewers to be reviewed. Following a community discussion, level 2 was retired from the English Stiles.casa Wiki in January 2017. It was suggested then that "Pending changes level 1" be referred to in the future as simply "Pending changes".<ref>VPR RfC to remove PC2</ref>

Protection by namespace

Article talk pages

Modifications to a protected page can be proposed on its talk page (or at another appropriate forum) for discussion. Administrators can make changes to the protected article reflecting consensus. Placing the {{Edit protected}} template on the talk page will draw the attention of administrators for implementing uncontroversial changes.

Talk pages are not usually protected, and are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of vandalism.

User talk pages

User talk pages are rarely protected. However, protection may be applied if there is severe vandalism or abuse. Users whose talk pages are protected may wish to have an unprotected user talk subpage linked conspicuously from their main talk page to allow good-faith comments from users that the protection restricts editing from.

A user's request to have their own talk page protected is not a sufficient rationale by itself to protect the page, although requests may be considered if a reason is provided.

Blocked users

Blocked users' user talk pages should not ordinarily be protected, as this interferes with the user's ability to contest their block through the normal process. It also prevents others from being able to use the talk page to communicate with the blocked editor.

In extreme cases of abuse by the blocked user, such as abuse of the {{unblock}} template, re-blocking the user with talk page access removed should be preferred over applying protection to the page. If the user has been blocked and with the ability to edit their user talk page disabled, they should be informed of this in a block notice, subsequent notice, or message, and it should include information and instructions for appealing their block off-wiki, such as through the UTRS tool interface or, as a last recourse, the Arbitration Committee.

When required, protection should be implemented for only a brief period, not exceeding the duration of the block.

Confirmed socks of registered users should be dealt with in accordance with Stiles.casa Wiki:Sockpuppetry; their pages are not normally protected.

User pages

Base user pages (for example, the page User:Example, and not User:Example/subpage or User talk:Example) are automatically protected from creation or editing by unconfirmed accounts and anonymous IP users. An exception to this includes an unconfirmed registered account attempting to create or edit their own user page. IP editors and unconfirmed accounts are also unable to create or edit user pages that do not belong to a currently-registered account. This protection is enforced by an edit filter.<ref>Please refer to Stiles.casa Wiki:Requests for comment/Protect user pages by default and its talk page for community discussion related to a preventative measure for user pages.</ref> Users may opt-out of this protection by placing {{unlocked userpage}} anywhere on their own user page.

User pages and subpages within their own user space may be protected upon a request from the user, as long as a need exists. Pages within the user space should not be automatically or pre-emptively protected without good reason or cause.<ref>Per discussion at Stiles.casa Wiki talk:Protection policy/Archive 15#Own userspace pages protection policy, June 2013</ref><ref>Per discussion at Stiles.casa Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive314#Protecting an editor's user page or user space per their request, September 2019</ref> Requests for protection specifically at uncommon levels (such as template protection) may be granted if the user has expressed a genuine and realistic need.

When a filter is insufficient to stop user page vandalism, a user may choose to create a ".css" subpage (ex. User:Example/Userpage.css), copy all the contents of their user page onto the subpage, transclude the subpage by putting {{User:Example/Userpage.css}} on their user page, and then ask an administrator to fully protect their user page. Because user space pages that end in ".css", ".js", and ".json" are editable only by the user to which that user space belongs (and interface administrators), this will protect your user page from further vandalism.

Deceased users

In the event of the confirmed death of a user, the user's user page (but not the user talk page) should be fully protected.

Protection of templates

Highly visible templates – those used on a large number of pages or frequently substituted – are often edit protected based on the degree of visibility, type of use, content, and other considerations.

Protected templates should normally have the {{documentation}} template. It loads the unprotected /doc page, so that non-admins and IP-users can edit the documentation, categories and interwiki links. It also automatically adds {{pp-template}} to protected templates, which displays a small padlock in the top right corner and categorizes the template as protected. Only manually add {{pp-template}} to protected templates that don't use {{documentation}} (mostly the flag templates).

Cascading protection should generally not be applied directly to templates, as it will not protect transclusions inside <includeonly> tags or transclusions that depend on template parameters, but will protect the template's documentation subpage. Instead, consider any of the following:

  • If the set of subtemplates is static (even if large), protect them using normal protection mechanisms.
  • If the set of subtemplates is unbounded, use MediaWiki:Titleblacklist to protect all subtemplates using a particular naming format (as is done for editnotice templates and subtemplates of Template:TFA title).

Note: All editnotice templates (except those in userspace) are already protected via MediaWiki:Titleblacklist. They can be edited by admins, template editors and page movers only.

Sandboxes

Sandboxes should not ordinarily be protected since their purpose is to let new users test and experiment with wiki syntax. Most sandboxes are automatically cleaned every 12 hours, although they are frequently overwritten by other testing users. The Stiles.casa Wiki:Sandbox is cleaned every hour. Those who use sandboxes for malicious purposes, or to violate policies such as no personal attacks, civility, or copyrights, should instead be warned and/or blocked.

Available templates

The following templates may be added at the very top of a page to indicate that it is protected:

On redirect pages, use the {{Redirect category shell}} template, which automatically categorizes by protection level, below the redirect line. A protection template may also be added below the redirect line, but it will serve only to categorize the page, as it will not be visible on the page, and it will have to be manually removed when protection is removed.

See also

Notes

<references group="" responsive="0"></references>